Is to boldly go grammatically correct?

For a long time, split infinitives like “to boldly go” were considered improper—even though some usage experts questioned whether the infinitive was being split at all. There’s no logical reason for the rule, and most modern usage guides say it’s fine to split one in the interest of clarity.

What is wrong with boldly go?

A split infinitive is when other words creep into the middle of an English infinitive. The most famous example is Star Trek’s “to boldly go where no one has gone before”. The Victorians decided that splitting an infinitive was a grammatical mistake, and some people still agree with them.

What is wrong with split infinitives?

Split infinitives are a specific type of misplaced modifier. Split infinitives should be avoided in formal writing. In formal writing, it is considered bad style to split an infinitive, but in more informal writing or in speech this has become more acceptable.

Which is correct’to boldly go’or’to go boldly’?

Those grammarians who still cared about this in the 1960s complained that ‘to boldly go’ should have been ‘to go boldly’. The debate had been simmering on and off for the best part of a century. As early as 1897, Academy magazine suggested that an insistence that split infinitives were incorrect was somewhat pedantic:

What does it mean To Boldly Go where no man has gone before?

To seek out new life and new civilizations. To boldly go where no man has gone before. This line reinvigorated the last-lasting debate over split infinitives. These are infinitives that have an adverb between ‘to’ and the verb. Those grammarians who still cared about this in the 1960s complained that ‘to boldly go’ should have been ‘to go boldly’.

Is the phrase’to boldly Go’a split infinitive?

Despite this, it’s actually been a subject of some controversy among grammar enthusiasts. In English grammar, the phrase “to boldly go” is a split infinitive, which English classes warn to never write.

When did Star Trek say To Boldly Go?

Most authorities now accept Star Trek into the grammatical fold and no longer care, or at least rarely publicly complain, about ‘to boldly go’. By 1966, people cared more about implied sexism than doubtful grammar and the show’s producers received criticism for the ‘no man’ part of the speech.