Useful tips

What is a Kritik policy debate?

What is a Kritik policy debate?

A kritik (from the German Kritik, meaning “critique” or “criticism”) is a form of argument in policy debate that challenges a certain mindset or assumption made by the opposing team, often from the perspective of critical theory.

What is high school policy debate?

Policy debate is a form of debate competition in which teams of two advocate for and against a resolution that typically calls for policy change by the United States federal government. Affirmative teams generally present a plan as a proposal for implementation of the resolution.

What is uniqueness in policy debate?

Uniqueness: An argument describing something in the status quo. Impact: an argument explaining why that condition of the status quo is damaging. Falls under the stock issue of harms. Solvency: an argument describing how the plan can alter the status quo to avoid the impact.

What is spreading in policy debate?

Spreading is the act of speaking extremely fast during a competitive debating event, with the intent that one’s opponent will be penalized for failing to respond to all arguments raised.

How is the Kritik presented in a debate?

The kritik is generally presented as an absolute argument. It demands a yes-or-no response from the judge, rather than an impact which is weighed against other arguments. The kritik may be non-unique. The side presenting a kritik may indulge in the same “hidden assumptions” for which it is kritiking the opposing team.

Which is the best definition of a kritik?

Kritiks are philosophically-based arguments which question fundamental assumptions underlying the arguments, positions, or presentation of one side in the debate. Since the kritik asks for the judge to evaluate the round based on the evaluation of the kritik, we can consider these arguments to be varieties of (formal) decision-rules.

Which is the thesis of the Kritik thesis?

The thesis of this kritik is that capitalism is evil. It dehumanizes people, because it does not think of them as complex, individual persons but rather as “consumers” to be manipulated into making purchases or working for minimal rewards. The capitalist ethic reduces people to things, which flies in the face of centuries of moral philosophy.