What law did Roth violate How did Roth violate this law?

The owner of a mail-order business in California, David Alberts, distributed publications that contained images of nude women. Each of them was convicted under an obscenity law, Roth for violating a federal statute and Phillips for violating a state law. Their cases were consolidated on appeal before the Supreme Court.

What law did Roth violate?

Facts of the case Roth operated a book-selling business in New York and was convicted of mailing obscene circulars and an obscene book in violation of a federal obscenity statute.

What did Roth vs the US decision do?

The major obscenity decision in Roth v. United States, 354 U.S. 476 (1957), provided the basis for an important test that the Supreme Court used to determine whether material was obscene or constitutionally protected.

Who won Roth vs US?

Roth came down as a 6–3 decision, with the opinion of the Court authored by William J. Brennan, Jr..

What was the case of Roth vs United States?

The case, Roth v. United States was appealed all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court. There, it was heard along with the case of Alberts v. California. The two cases involved obscene material, but took different approaches in their defense. With Roth, the claim was that the conviction violated Roth’s right to free speech under the First Amendment.

Who was the petitioner in Roth v California?

U.S. Supreme Court Samuel ROTH, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES of America. David S. ALBERTS, Appellant, v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA. Samuel ROTH, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES of America. David S. ALBERTS, Appellant, v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA.

What was the outcome of the Roth vs Alberts case?

Lesson Summary. The cases of Roth v. United States and Alberts v. California were decided by the U.S. Supreme Court in June 1957. These cases both involved convictions the plaintiffs received for mailing material that was deemed to be obscene. This obscene material was mailed by the plaintiffs for their businesses.

Who was the Supreme Court justice for Samuel Roth?

No. 582: Mr. David von G. Albrecht, New York City, and O. John Rogge, Washington, D.C., for petitioner Roth. Mr. Roger D. Fisher, Washington, D.C., for the United States. [Amicus Curiae Information from page 478 intentionally omitted] Mr. Justice BRENNAN delivered the opinion of the Court.